Accès gratuit
Orthod Fr
Volume 78, Numéro 1, Mars 2007
Rapport de la 79e réunion scientifique de la S.F.O.D.F. – Développement cranio-facial : génétique et expériences naturelles
Page(s) 39 - 48
Publié en ligne 23 mars 2007
  1. Alappat S, Zhang ZY, Chen YP. Msx homeobox gene family and craniofacial development. Cell Res 2003;13:429–442. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bendall AJ, Abate-Shen C. Roles for Msx and Dlx homeoproteins in vertebrate development. Gene 2000;247:7–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blin-Wakkach C, Lézot F, Ghoul-Mazgar S, Hotton D, Monteiro S, Teillaud C, et al. Endogenous Msx1 antisense transcript: In vivo and in vitro evidences, structure, and potential involvement in skeleton development in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98(13):7336–7341. [Google Scholar]
  4. Catron KM, Zhang H, Marshall SC, Inostroza JA, Wilson JM, Abate C. Transcriptional repression by Msx-1 does not require homeodomain DNA-binding sites. Mol Cell Biol 1995;15:861–871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chishti MS, Muhammad D, Haider M, Ahmad W. A novel missense mutation in MSX1 underlies autosomal recessive oligodontia with associated dental anomalies in Pakistani families. J Hum Genet 2006;51(10):872–878. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cobourne MT, Sharpe PT. Tooth and jaw: molecular mechanisms of patterning in the first branchial arch. Arch Oral Biol 2003;48(1):1–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coudert A. Étude de l'expression et de la régulation du transcrit antisens du gène Msx1 au cours du développement embryonnaire : approches expérimentales dans l'odontogenèse. Thèse Doct État. Paris: Univ P. et M. Curie, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  8. Davidson D. The function and evolution of Msx genes: pointers and paradoxes. Trends Genet 1995;11:405–411. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Muynck S, Schollen E, Matthijs G, Verdonck A, Devriendt K, Carels C. A novel MSX1 mutation in hypodontia. Am J Med Genet A 2004;128(4):401–403. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Francis-West FH, Robson L, Evans DJR. Craniofacial development: The tissue and molecular interactions that control development of the head. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 2003;169:III-VI,1–138. [Google Scholar]
  11. Frazier-Bowers SA, Guo DC, Cavender A, Xue L, Evans B, King T, et al. A novel mutation in human PAX9 causes molar oligodontia. J Dent Res 2002;81:1296–1333. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hill RE, Jones PF, Rees AR, Sime CM, Justice MJ, Copeland NG, et al. A new family of mouse homeobox-containing genes: molecular structure, chromosomal location, and developmental expression of Hox-7.1. Genes Dev 1989;3:26–37. [Google Scholar]
  13. Houzelstein D, Cohen A, Buckingham ME, Robert B. Insertional mutation of the mouse Msx1 homeobox gene by an nlacZ reporter gene. Mech Dev 1997;65:123–133. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hovde S, Abate-Shen C, Geiger JH. Crystal structure of the Msx-1 homeodomain/DNA complex. Biochemistry 2001;40:12013–12021. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hu G, Lee H, Price SM, Shen MM, Abate-Shen C. Msx homeobox genes inhibit differentiation through upregulation of cyclin D1. Development 2001;128:2373–2384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hu G, Vastardis H, Bendall AJ, Wang Z, Logan M, Zhang H, et al. Haploinsufficiency of MSX1: a Mechanism for selective tooth agenesis. Mol Cell Biol 1998;18:6044–6051. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jezewski PA, Vieira AR, Nishimura C, Ludwig B, Johnson M, O'Brien SE, et al. Complete sequencing shows a role for MSX1 in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate. J Med Genet 2003;40(6):399–407. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jumlongras D, Bei M, Stimson JM, Wang WF, DePalma SR, Seidman CE, et al. A nonsense mutation in MSX1 causes Witkop syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2001;69:67–74. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim HJ, Rice DPC, Kettunen PJ, Thesleff I. FGF-, BMP- and Shh-mediated signalling pathways in the regulation of cranial suture morphogenesis and calvarial bone development. Development 1998;125:1241–1251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim JW, Simmer JP, Lin BP, Hu JC. Novel MSX1 frameshift causes autosomal-dominant oligodontia. J Dent Res 2006;85(3):267–271. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kiyosawa H, Yamanaka I, Osato N, Kondo S, Hayashizaki Y. Antisense transcripts with FANTOM2 clone set and their implications for gene regulation. Genome Res 2003;13:1324–1334. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuzuoka M, Takahashi T, Guron C, Raghow R. Murine homeobox-containing gene, Msx-1: analysis of genomic organization, promoter structure, and potential autoregulatory cis-acting elements. Genomics 1994;21:85–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lidral AC, Reising BC. The role of MSX1 in human tooth agenesis. J Dent Res 2002;81:274–278. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lumsden AG. Spatial organization of the epithelium and the role of neural crest cells in the initiation of the mammalian tooth germ. Development 1988;103 (Suppl): 155–169. [Google Scholar]
  25. Maas R, Bei M. The genetic control of early tooth development. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:4–39. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. MacKenzie A, Ferguson MWJ, Sharpe PT. Hox-7 expression during murine craniofacial development. Development 1991;113:601–611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. MacKenzie A, Leeming GL, Jowett AK, Ferguson MW, Sharpe PT. The homeobox gene Hox 7.1 has specific regional and temporal expression patterns during early murine craniofacial embryogenesis, especially tooth development in vivo and in vitro. Development 1991;111:269–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mina M, Kollar EJ. The induction of odontogenesis in non-dental mesenchyme combined with early murine mandibular arch epithelium. Arch Oral Biol 1987;32:123–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Monaghan AP, Davidson DR, Sime C, Graham E, Baldock R, Bhattacharya SS, et al. The Msh-like homeobox genes define domains in the developing vertebrate eye. Development 1991;112:1053–1061. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mostowska A, Biedziak B, Trzeciak WH. A novel c.581C>T transition localized in a highly conserved homeobox sequence of MSX1: is it responsible for oligodontia? J Appl Genet 2006;47(2):159–164. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nieminen P, Kotilainen J, Aalto Y, Knuutila S, Pirinen S, Thesleff I. MSX1 gene is deleted in Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome patients with oligodontia. J Dent Res 2003;82:1013–1017. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nugent P, Greene RM. MSX-1 gene expression and regulation in embryonic palatal tissue. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1998;34:831–835. [Google Scholar]
  33. Odelberg SJ, Kolhoff A, Keating MT. Dedifferentiation of mammalian myotubes induced by msx1. Cell 2000;103:1099–1109. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Orestes-Cardoso SM, Néfussi JR, Hotton D, Mesbah M, Orestes-Cardoso MDS, Robert B, et al. Postnatal Msx1 expression pattern in craniofacial, axial and appendicular skeleton of transgenic mice from the first week until the second year. Dev Dyn 2001;221:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  35. Orestes-Cardoso SM, Néfussi JR, Lézot F, Oboeuf M, Pereira M, Mesbah M, et al. Msx1 Is a regulator of bone formation during development and postnatal growth : In vivo investigations in a transgenic mouse model. Conn Tissue Res 2002;43:153–160. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ramos C, Fernandez-Llebrez P, Bach A, Robert B, Soriano E. Msx1 disruption leads to diencephalon defects and hydrocephalus. Dev Dyn 2004;230:446–460. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ramos C, Martinez A, Robert B, Soriano E. Msx1 expression in the adult mouse brain: characterization of populations of beta-galactosidase-positive cells in the hippocampus and fimbria. Neuroscience 2004;127: 893–900. [Google Scholar]
  38. Reginelli AD, Wang YQ, Sassoon D, Muneoka K. Digit tip regeneration correlates with regions of Msx1 (Hox 7) expression in fetal and newborn mice. Development 1995;121:1065–1076. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Robert B, Sassoon D, Jacq B, Gehring W, Buckingham M. Hox-7, a mouse homeobox gene with a novel pattern of expression during embryogenesis. Embo J 1989;8:91–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Satokata I, Maas R. Msx1 deficient mice exhibit cleft palate and abnormalities of craniofacial and tooth development. Nat Genet 1994;6:348–356. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sharpe PT. Homeobox genes and orofacial development. Connect Tissue Res 1995;32:17–25. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Shashikant CS, Utset MF, Violette SM, Wise TL, Einat P, Einat M, et al. Homeobox genes in mouse development. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 1991;1:207–245. [Google Scholar]
  43. Shetty S, Takahashi T, Matsui H, Ayengar R, Raghow R. Transcriptional autorepression of Msx1 gene is mediated by interactions of Msx1 protein with a multi-protein transcriptional complex containing TATA-binding protein, Sp1 and cAMP-response-element-binding protein-binding protein (CBP/p300). Biochem J 1999;339 (Pt 3): 751–758. [Google Scholar]
  44. Thesleff I, Mikkola M. The role of growth factors in tooth development. Int Rev Cytol 2002;217:93–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Thesleff I, Vaahtokari A, Kettunen P, Aberg T. Epithelial-mesenchymal signalling during tooth development. Connect Tissue Res 1995;32:9–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Thomas BL, Porteus MH, Rubenstein JLR, Sharpe PT. The spatial localization of Dlx2 during tooth development. Connect Tissue Res 1995;32:27–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Thomas BL, Tucker AS, Ferguson C, Qiu M, Rubenstein JLR, Sharpe PT. Molecular control of odontogenic patterning: Positional dependent initiation and morphogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106 (Suppl 1):44–47. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tongkobpetch S, Siriwan P, Shotelersuk V. MSX1 mutations contribute to nonsyndromic cleft lip in a Thai population. Hum Genet 2006;51(8):671–676. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tribulo C, Aybar MJ, Sanchez SS, Mayor R. A balance between the anti-apoptotic activity of Slug and the apoptotic activity of msx1 is required for the proper development of the neural crest. Dev Biol 2004;275:325–342. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tucker A, Sharpe PT. The cutting-edge of mammalian development; how the embryo makes teeth. Nat Rev Genet 2004;5:499–508. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tureckova J, Sahlberg C, Aberg T, Ruch JV, Thesleff I, Peterkova R. Comparison of expression of the msx-1, msx-2, BMP-2 and BMP-4 genes in the mouse upper diastemal and molar tooth primordia. Int J Dev Biol 1995;39:459–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Vainio S, Karavanova I, Jowett A, Thesleff I. Identification of BMP4 as a signal mediating secondary induction between epithelial and mesenchymal tissues during early tooth development. Cell 1993;75:45–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Van den Boogaard MJ, Dorland M, Beermer FA, van Amstel HK. MSX1 mutation is associated with orofacial clefting and tooth agenesis in humans. Nat Genet 2000;24(4):342–343. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Vastardis H, Karimbux N, Guthua SW, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. A human MSX1 homeodomain missense mutation causes selective tooth agenesis. Nat Genet 1996;13:417–421. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Vi-Fane B. Étude des transcrits sens et antisens de l'homéogène Msx1 dans le tissu osseux oro-facial. Mémoire de DEA de Biologie Orale et Ostéo-articulaire, Biomatériaux et Biofonctionnalité. Paris: Univ Denis Diderot, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  56. Vi-Fane B, Néfussi JR, Orestes-Cardoso S, Hotton D, Robert B, Chabre C, et al. Pour une approche génétique et expérimentale de la croissance squelettique cranio-faciale : étude du rôle de l'homéogène divergent Msx1. Orthod Fr 2003;74:103–113. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang W, Chen X, Xu H, Lufkin T. Msx3: a novel murine homologue of the Drosophila msh homeobox gene restricted to the dorsal embryonic central nervous system. Mech Dev 1996;58:203–215. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Weiss KM, Bollekens J, Ruddle F, Takashita K. Distal-less and other homeobox genes in the development of the dentition. J Experimental Zoology 1994;270: 273–284. [Google Scholar]
  59. Weiss KM, Stock DW, Zhao Z. Dynamic interactions and the evolutionary genetics of dental patterning. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1998;9(4):369–398. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Werner A, Berdal A. Natural antisense transcripts: sound or silence? Physiol Genomic 2005;23(2): 125–131. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang H, Catron KM, Abate-Shen C. A role for the Msx-1 homeodomain in transcriptional regulation: residues in the N-terminal arm mediate TATA binding protein interaction and transcriptional repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:1764–1769. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhang Z, Song Y, Zhao X, Zhang X, Fermin C, Chen Y. Rescue of cleft palate in Msx1-deficient mice by transgenic Bmp4 reveals a network of BMP and Shh signaling in the regulation of mammalian palatogenesis. Development 2002;129:4135–4146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.