Accès gratuit
Orthod Fr
Volume 81, Numéro 4, Décembre 2010
Page(s) 279 - 286
Publié en ligne 10 décembre 2010
  1. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, Tollaro I. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion : a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111 :502–509. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment timing for twin block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2000;118 :159–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method. Semin Orthod 2005;11 :119–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bishara SE, Justus R, Graber TM. Proceedings of the workshop discussions on early treatment held by the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics in Quebec City, Canada, on July 13-17, 1997. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113 :5–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hägg U, Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development. An analysis of 72 male patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1988;10 :169–176. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hansen K, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development : a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 1992;14 :285–295. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lamparski DG. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. Dissertation. Pittsburgh : The University of Pittsburgh, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lavergne J, Gasson N. Operational definitions of mandibular morphogenetic and positional rotations. Scand J Dent Res 1977;85 :185–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Malmgren O, Ömblus J, Hägg U, Pancherz H. Treatment with an appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91 :143–151. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McNamara JA Jr, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients. Am J Orthod 1985;88 :91–110. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O’Reilly M, Yanniello GJ. Mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae-a longitudinal cephalometric study. Angle Orthod 1988;58 :179–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pancherz H. The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment : a cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100 :220–233. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pancherz H. The modern Herbst appliance. In : Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG, eds. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. 2nd ed., St. Louis : Mosby-Yearbook, 1997 :336–366. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pancherz H, Fackel U. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1990;12 :209–218. [Google Scholar]
  15. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Lavergne J. Mechanism of craniofacial growth and modus operandi of functional appliances : a cell-level and cybernetic approach to orthodontic decision making. In : Carlson DS, ed. Craniofacial growth theory and orthodontic treatment. Craniofacial Growth Series, Vol 23, Ann Arbor : Center for Human Growth and Development, Univ. Michigan, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sadowski PL. Craniofacial growth and the timing of treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113 :19–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Skeletal and dentoalveolar adaptations produced by twin block appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116 :597–609. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. White L. Early orthodontic intervention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:24–28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]