Accès gratuit
Numéro
Orthod Fr
Volume 90, Numéro 1, Mars 2019
91e réunion scientifique SFODF Nice 2019 et varia
Page(s) 13 - 27
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/2019003
Publié en ligne 17 avril 2019
  1. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Giuntini V, Masucci C, Vangelisti A, Defraia E. Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite : a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142(1):75–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:119–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Batista KBSL, Thiruvenkatachri B, Harrison JE, O’brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003452. [Google Scholar]
  4. Felpeto B, Garrec P, Le potentiel auxologique mandibulaire : un indicateur pronostique du traitement orthopédique des classes II. Mémoire CECSMO. Paris: Univ Diderot; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hägg U, Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development. An analysis of 72 male patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10:169–176. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hansen K, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:285–295. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lamparski DG, Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. Dissertation. Pittsburgh : The University of Pittsburgh. 1972. [Google Scholar]